ext_26492 ([identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] jay 2004-01-05 12:40 pm (UTC)

Re: Mea Culpa, and apologies for the tone (part 1)

I get into the most trouble that way. ;^)

(smile) I think I know you well enough to recognize venting vs. advice... besides, I get myself into trouble that way arguably more often still, as you've alluded, so I'm hardly going to throw stones. Living in a Glass house, especially...

Thanks for clearing up the source of your ire, I had been mystified by the response proportional to the original post. I would be happy to meet offline and discuss the previous weeks, and you could then be as snarky as you felt like ;^).

Here's how it looks from my perspective...

That's pretty close, not surprising given your insightfulness. My proceeding without cross-checking... I have always operated on the basis that I could run with unproven facts or assertions as long as they didn't obligate anyone else to anything. But what you seem to be saying is that I'm sort of negatively-obligating others, when they hadn't asked for it.

Try OTHER methods of communication, if one fails.

Good point... ultimately, [personal profile] hopeforyou saw the above post and called me. I had actually tried IMs to a couple of people... and I have no phone numbers for any of the Observatory folks, none for anyone other than your cell and the main House Dreamland number. I have no idea how to contact Laura, similarly. That local group may be incredibly interconnected internally, but I'm barely connnected to it... (I won't use "we" here, myself ;) So in some sense, this LJ post was another method of communication, one where I could hope that someone in that group might see it and then contact me in a comment or by other means.




Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting