jay: (flowers)
jay ([personal profile] jay) wrote2004-01-22 01:39 pm

Forced back

I just talked to K, the rector of our parish... because of "lifestyle issues", specifically, I will not be allowed to be a vestry candidate, or a candidate for anything else that represents the parish. If I insist on running for any office, he will remove my eligibility by writing a disciplinary letter to the diocese, thus making me a member-not-in-good-standing. Poly-sensitivity outweighs any gain that the organization might get from my talents and skills. K justified having existing gay vestry members, but not poly, as, "people are of several minds on homosexuality within the church, but everyone agrees that monogamy is the biblical standard."

If I don't force the issue, I will continue to be allowed to participate as a member... allowed communion, but essentially nothing further. [profile] patgreene has asked me to not force their hand, if only to not make things harder on her and the kids. So I will probably retreat back to my corner...

[identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com 2004-01-22 10:50 pm (UTC)(link)
I wonder if Abraham's priest told him that monogamy's the biblical standard. :P

[identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com 2004-01-24 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
At other times, K has admitted that there's abundant non-monogamy in the bible, enough for an ethical justification. Whether his views have changed, or whether "ethically justified" doesn't equal "out of the closet" remains to be seen.