jay: (wired)
[personal profile] jay
Early results...
Remote-rovers, terrestrial-controlled (w/delays) observation rate = 0.12
Remote-rovers, Mars-controlled (w/o delays) obs rate = 1 (normalized)
Spacesuited human, obs rate = 5
Shirtsleeve - free human geologist, obs rate = 27

There are too few datapoints to say definitively, but these results imply that a local spacesuited human has something like 40x the science productivity of a Earth-controlled rover...

Date: 2003-02-13 12:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hopeforyou.livejournal.com
Interesting. I wonder what can be done to shrink the gap between a spacesuited human and a free human geologist. Any ideas? What are the most limiting factors to using the suits?

Date: 2003-02-13 03:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purplecthulhu.livejournal.com
What are the relevant cost factors for Mars? IIRC Sojurner and Pathfinder cost about 100 Million US. That would make a manned missed cost-effective (in some sense) if it came in at less than 4 billion... I think a Mars mission is more like 20 to 40 billion?

Date: 2003-02-13 10:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] hopeforyou.livejournal.com
Hah. So the nay sayers can put *that* in thier "robotic missions only" pipe, and smoke it.

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 03:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios