jay: (flowers)
[personal profile] jay
From the LJ Valentine website:
If nobody nominated you - and you didn't make a match then no email was sent.

Date: 2003-02-14 11:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anisoptera.livejournal.com
Me too. No matches. I did three but no one did one for me.

Happy Valentine's Day!

Date: 2003-02-14 11:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lavendargrrl.livejournal.com
ok...I feel like a stupid newbie...lol...what lj valentine website?

Date: 2003-02-14 11:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] daltong.livejournal.com
I did 3 matches that I thought were sure things and I didn't get any. (And I was too late for the 5 match upgrade.)

I don't think many people knew about it. Only about 3700 responded, out of what I believe is about a million LJ users. So it's entirely possible your Valentines didn't even participate.

Date: 2003-02-14 11:29 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] griffen.livejournal.com
I didn't even apply, so I'm sorry that I didn't. I should have, now that I think of it. :(

Date: 2003-02-14 11:47 am (UTC)

Date: 2003-02-14 11:50 am (UTC)
geekchick: (Default)
From: [personal profile] geekchick
I didn't go near the site until this morning, whenI found that it was already closed. Sorry, dear.

Date: 2003-02-14 11:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
I know that neither of my sweeties participated.

Date: 2003-02-14 11:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
Ah. Serves me right for presuming... (wry grin)

Date: 2003-02-14 12:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com
Me tooooo...!!!

Will you be a Valentine, [livejournal.com profile] brian1789?

Date: 2003-02-14 12:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
I figured I'd get at least one match from an existing partner... but that presumed that they were interested in playing this particular LJVD game, or knew about it. Oh, well... on top of that, no one that I *didn't* match chose me, either. Feh.

Date: 2003-02-14 12:09 pm (UTC)
geekchick: (affection)
From: [personal profile] geekchick
I sent flowers instead. ;-P

Date: 2003-02-14 12:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
There was a "name five people you want to send an anonymous valentine to, and if they also chose you, you'll both be notified" game running about last week. I don't tend to share valentiney stuff outside of my existing-lover range, and I know neither of them participated.

Date: 2003-02-14 12:19 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
Of course! :-) Hmmm... you should have gotten an email... (wonders about bugs).

Date: 2003-02-14 12:21 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
It was an online Valentine game... see http://www.steve.org.uk/lvs/index.html .

Date: 2003-02-14 12:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
Is that the large box that arrived, addressed to [profile] patgreene?
;-)

Date: 2003-02-14 12:23 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
At least it isn't harvesting and sending email addresses, a la Crushlink...

Date: 2003-02-14 12:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
If you were interested in the game otherwise, sure. But doing it *for* someone specifically seems vaguely codependent?

Date: 2003-02-14 12:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
The depressing part IMO isn't the lack of matches, it's the lack of misses, i.e. unrequited nominations. But have a happy Valentine's Day yourself :-).

Date: 2003-02-14 12:28 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
Ah -- see http://www.steve.org.uk/lvs/index.html, it was a LJ valentine game...

Date: 2003-02-14 12:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elorie.livejournal.com
I didn't get any either **sniff**

Date: 2003-02-14 12:37 pm (UTC)
geekchick: (Default)
From: [personal profile] geekchick
Yes, they'd only let me put one name in their order form. The card however is more inclusive (assuming I remembered to actually sign this one). ;)

Re:

Date: 2003-02-14 12:43 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anisoptera.livejournal.com
Right...no one put me down for a valentine either or have I have I missed your meaning again?

Going out with a [livejournal.com profile] dragonblue1964 to an friends opening. I sure there is some chocolate on the horizon for me tonight. :)

Date: 2003-02-14 12:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
You're correct... I meant that while matches are definitionally hit-or-miss, not even being nominated by anyone is worse. Better unrequited than invisible?

Date: 2003-02-14 12:50 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
(grin) Pat says that the pink and white carnations are lovely, and that yes, you signed the card :-).

Re:

Date: 2003-02-14 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] anisoptera.livejournal.com
Yep. I'm with you. I wanted to comiserate with you but don't feel too sorry for me. I had lunch with [livejournal.com profile] 98 yesterday and we stared meaningfully into each others eyes as well as other PDA's. There was not much time for anything else as he's working flat out on a contract that is almost finished.

I did get the cutest e-card from a sweet friend and that was a nice surprise.

I'm betting tonight or tomorrow will be better for you.

Date: 2003-02-14 12:52 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
That scrapes :-|. Surprising, really -- I thought you'd have gotten several nominations... I'm beginning to wonder if there were flaws in the application software.

Date: 2003-02-14 01:01 pm (UTC)
geekchick: (affection)
From: [personal profile] geekchick
Pink and white, eh? Hrm. At least this year they sent the right *type* of flowers, if not exactly what I thought I was getting, and I assume the card wasn't from "Jeremy" either. ;)

Date: 2003-02-14 01:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] griffen.livejournal.com
That's the main reason I didn't participate.

But if I'd known that it might have made people feel better, I would have. Now I feel dumb.

Date: 2003-02-14 01:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] patgreene.livejournal.com
No, they're pink and *red*. quite lovely. Thanks, sweetie,

Date: 2003-02-14 02:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lavendargrrl.livejournal.com
well, bummer...I hadn't the vaguest notion this was happening or I would have enthusiastically been nominating a few folks...~g~ oh well, next year I guess...

I didnt get any either.

Date: 2003-02-14 03:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] p3aches.livejournal.com
I did not get any LJ valentine nominations either. I didnt even know about it till today.

Date: 2003-02-14 04:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] boubabe.livejournal.com
I couldn't even get through to the site, with the message saying that the site couldn't be found. I'm know I'm not the only one who couldn't get access to it.

Date: 2003-02-14 05:42 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dawnd.livejournal.com
Yeah, I couldn't access the site, either. Thus, my annoyed message from this morning.

In any case:

Happy Valentine's Day, Brian!

Date: 2003-02-14 11:34 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
(smile) That's what I'd have said to you, likewise. Thanks!

Date: 2003-02-14 11:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
I think that it was set up to block access after 1200 in one's own timezone... but if it couldn't be found, then that sounds like a local DNS issue. (hug) anyway...

Re: I didnt get any either.

Date: 2003-02-14 11:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
I'm a bit surprised, again... I would have thought that your Tribe alone would have had nominations whizzing back and forth. (hug) hope that you had a good day.

Date: 2003-02-14 11:45 pm (UTC)
geekchick: (Default)
From: [personal profile] geekchick
Woohoo! They got one right! ;)

Date: 2003-02-14 11:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com
I did... but because I only had three nominations, I only got one identification. So I think you just solved one of my two mysteries :-)

Date: 2003-02-14 11:49 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com
It was only three people, when I did mine on Wednesday. The system could have been set up to update people who had already signed, when the limit was increased... :-(

Date: 2003-02-14 11:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com
Why don't we ask them to re-activate the software for World Book Day on Mar 6? The tradition is to send a book and a flower to dear ones on that day. So, with a slight change of wording, one could easily use the system to send a book title and a flower description?

Re: I didnt get any either.

Date: 2003-02-18 09:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] p3aches.livejournal.com
I had an interesting weekend.

Re: I didnt get any either.

Date: 2003-02-18 10:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
(grin) so it sounds like... hope that it was fun. And your dance card has refilled itself, it appears ;-).

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 12:00 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios