jay: (contemplative)
jay ([personal profile] jay) wrote2003-11-17 12:23 am

Reflections on validation needs

Or, why I went about dragging myself into an ongoing local social feud, since last spring... but this is not an attempt to reopen those several lines of discussion. This is a note for myself, for future reference when I find myself slipping back into a susceptible state. It is difficult to discuss, and embarrassing.



One comment at the time by [personal profile] firecat stuck meme-like in my head, through the summer. I've lost the link, but it was posted in a community somewhere... something along the lines of it being common to see people trying to manipulate others for their advantage, but perplexing to see someone so intent on manipulating others for his disadvantage. At the time, I shrugged it off as more snarkiness from the nebulous other side.

About a month ago, I suddenly came to the realization that she had been correct... and with more contemplation, I realized why I'd been motivated towards apparently self-destructive behaviors. When I'm depressed, or overly stressed, I'm highly self-critical. Sometimes that self-criticism comes out in my writing, although I've done better lately about filtering it. I didn't start the local cliqueishness or feuding, the current episode started in mid-2002. What I did was to drag myself into it -- looking for validation of my self-criticism, and hence of my view of reality. A control issue.

In other words, if I think I'm an unworthy schmuck, but friends tell me otherwise, there's a conflict in views of what's real about myself. One way of reassuring myself that I'm still well-grounded and in control is to find corroborating evidence. And there existed a small-c community of individuals who were easily prodded into giving me that evidence... all it took was an outrageous statement or two, or simply taking an unpopular stance in a public forum, and lots of people were happy to tell me what an unworthy schmuck I was. Thereby validating my internal models of myself. Hence there was a gain for me in so doing.

There are perhaps analogues with other power games, or roleplaying... someone volunteering to be punished because they've been a bad boy, say... but out in a public forum, there is no safeword, no way to extract oneself when the piling-on becomes unbearable. So, apart from the ethics involved in nonconsensual manipulation, this is not a practical validation approach, either.

The manipulation is/was still offensive... I can't defend that. But I can remind myself of what my motivations were, in order to intercept those in the future, or be aware of which states of mind are likely to be susceptible. And remind myself to let go of the need to be right, even right about my self-views. So far, it has worked... twice this fall I've pulled back from posting things after questioning my motives. But it will require vigilance, and probably help from friends if it seems like I'm backsliding.

And other actions... first and foremost, personal apologies to those who were nearest-and-dearest at those times, or were caught up as collateral damage. [profile] patgreene, [personal profile] dawnd, [personal profile] geekchick immediately come to mind. I have talked to all of them personally. And while it is probably too late to ever be on friendly terms with some of the people on the other side, given their own behaviors, I want to try to bridge-build a bit, and reestablish contact with those folks who weren't particularly nasty to me at the time.

And no, I'm not a worthless schmuck, either, and this isn't an exercise in self-flagellation. Or grovelling, either. I suppose it is another [expletive] growth experience, perhaps. I'm too competent and capable otherwise to keep sabotaging myself in this fashion.

[identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 06:14 am (UTC)(link)
And while it is probably too late to ever be on friendly terms with some of the people on the other side, given their own behaviors,

"...and my own"?

??

[identity profile] dawnd.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 07:22 am (UTC)(link)
OK, I'm seriously asking here. I wonder why you felt moved to add that in, given that the entire rest of the entry, AFAICT, is admitting to his own complicity in the matter. At the risk of reading too much in to an EXTREMELY short comment, it feels like a dig at Brian--"remember, you brought this all on yourself." While I agree that Brian most certainly had a hand in creating this situation, I feel that the line that you partially quote is a fairly accurate depiction of how he views the whole thing now--essentially, there are some folks that he can re-build bridges with (and he intends to try), and there's another set of folks that he can't, in large part because what they did in that situation and later is simply too hurtful and/or they show no signs of being open to reconnection (as demonstrated by "their own behaviors"). Is there some other interpretation of your comment that I'm missing here that might be better and/or more useful? Thanks for explaining.

Re: ??

[identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 07:28 am (UTC)(link)
One of the ways that Brian and I discuss this stuff is that I let Brian know when I think his language is unclear, and sometimes he clarifies. It was a question (note the question mark); I was asking if he meant "because of their actions and my own" and had just been using shorthand. If I've hurt his feelings by asking the question, I think he knows that I'm open to discussing it, and I think (though he can correct me if I'm wrong) that Brian understands that I am not slapping him down; we have a history of talking this stuff out calmly, but not sugar-coating anything.

(Brian, please do correct me if any of this is misstating things, in your view.)

Re: ??

[identity profile] dawnd.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 07:36 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the explanation. The "clarifying nature" of the comment was what was unclear to the outside observer. Thanks.

Re: ??

[identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 08:44 am (UTC)(link)
(chuckle) granted, this time I had to take a deep breath and then re-read it to figure out what you were doing. This is a hard thing for me to discuss openly, there are recent scars, and I have to work on not becoming reflexively defensive.

I had felt that "and my own" was a given, since that was the context of the whole entry... I'm certainly not disavowing responsibility for my stuff in this discussion.

Re: ??

[identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 08:50 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry I was unnecessarily terse; I didn't adequately adjust for your stated stress level over this, and I'm sorry it caused you angst.

Re: ??

[identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 09:13 am (UTC)(link)
(grin) hey, don't worry about it! (hug) Thanks for asking.

Re: ??

[identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 09:16 am (UTC)(link)
Thanks for being gracious. I so rarely post just to be mean, and when I do, it's usually pretty obvious. :-)

Re: ??

[identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 08:27 am (UTC)(link)
I'm not disavowing complicity in the ongoing series... and this wasn't just in April, but as recently as early August. And your read is correct, in this context. There are some people that I don't currently feel I can ever be anything other than wary around, because of their past behaviors -- even when their given behavior was in reaction to something that I said or did. Even in the context of this thread... it's not all about me. (wry grin)

Re: ??

[identity profile] who-is-she.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 08:45 am (UTC)(link)
"it's not all about me. (wry grin) "

ROFL
you ROCK, Brian.
:)
ext_2918: (Default)

Re: ??

[identity profile] therealjae.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 10:13 am (UTC)(link)
Heeeee. *delighted applause*

-J

[identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 07:40 am (UTC)(link)
Undoubtedly, but others' personal comfort/safety levels, or simple likes/dislikes, are not mine to determine.

[identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 07:43 am (UTC)(link)
I see. Are there some of them that you would *want* to be on friendly terms with? (Just wondering and pondering; not feeling argumentative.)

[identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 09:11 am (UTC)(link)
I wasn't motivated by any interest in picking-up someone, if that's what you're saying ;-). Actually, that's a hard question, at this point in time. There are "some of them" with whom I used to be on friendly terms, and who largely stayed out of the piling-on, and there I'd like to try to slowly resume some kind of communication. Others whom I've never actually met, so I can't say.

[identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 09:15 am (UTC)(link)
Oh, nonono, I wasn't even thinking about picking people up. I was just musing about my own feelings about things when there are people I want to be friends with, but they're mad at me or unwilling to be friends. It's something I have trouble letting go of.

[identity profile] patgreene.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 08:54 am (UTC)(link)
Actually, given that's Brian's already admitted that his actions were indefensible, I think the phrase you're suggesting is redundant. And while his actions were indefensible (which he admits and which I think we all agree on), some of the responses to his behavior were pretty horrid too.

I read this as indicating a continuing level of discomfort on his part with some people. Of course, I have the benefit of twenty-odd years of experience with him, so it may be the language is unclear and I don't see it.

[identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 08:57 am (UTC)(link)
I was just clarifying. I intended no offense.

[identity profile] patgreene.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 09:08 am (UTC)(link)
Sorry, looking at it, my words came out stronger than I meant them. I'm still sort of touchy about all this.

[identity profile] patgreene.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 09:11 am (UTC)(link)
Also, this should teach me not to respond to a comment before I read *all* the comments in the thread. I'm sorry. You did state that you were asking for a clarification. My response was much more strident than was called for.

[identity profile] serenejournal.livejournal.com 2003-11-17 09:16 am (UTC)(link)
No problem at all. Thanks.