Date: 2004-02-28 09:57 am (UTC)
In what way would this economically damage San Francisco? I thought married couples payed *less* tax than unmarried, so in some sense it could be economically beneficial. Or does San Francisco have major marriage tourism which might be affected?

Of course, this might provide an interesting way to get married to two people (one in San francisco and one outside) for the polys among us.

Meanwhile, a question occurs to me... What is the sexual status of transgendered people in the US? Are they deemed to remain their pre-op sex, which is the case in the UK >spit< or to be their new sex? How does this affect marriage post-op?

More and more this whole thing indicates that governments have no place in defining who is whose partner.
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
(will be screened if not validated)
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 10th, 2025 11:37 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios