jay: (sunglasses)
[personal profile] jay
Finally... Parkfield went off! Twenty years too late, arguably, but at least before cutbacks removed most of the intense instrumentation there. :).

Date: 2004-09-28 07:51 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
And seismologists were beginning to worry that it might be 7.0 or greater, given its level of tardiness, so I'm glad that it wasn't a dangerous quake.

Date: 2004-09-28 09:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] tenacious-snail.livejournal.com
many of my co-workers felt it here. Which I find surprising given how quake-proof this building is. I didn't, but I'm still a bit wobbly and dizzy from playing with meds earlier this week.

Date: 2004-09-29 12:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] airshipjones.livejournal.com
The 5+ M quakes outside Mammoth were also overdue, I think. And so much for the guy in LA predicting the Big One down there. And the aftermotion suggests it is not a precursor, though it is rather close to the Paso Robles site. I sure would like to see a stress map of the San Andreas though.

Date: 2004-10-01 06:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
Likewise, although anything around Mammoth makes me a bit wary of volcanic precursors, as well...

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 29th, 2025 05:34 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios