rotational greetings...
Happy solstice, for those who celebrate it.... it doesn't work for me, per se, but I respect the choices of others to follow their own spiritual paths.
...
A useful link for those inclined to planetary movement-based holidays (solstice, equinoxes, etc) is here, with tables of dates and UTC times of each from 1992-2020.
...
A useful link for those inclined to planetary movement-based holidays (solstice, equinoxes, etc) is here, with tables of dates and UTC times of each from 1992-2020.
no subject
You know, you just completely undid the Happy Solstice part. You comprimised the good wishes with derision. I'm surely hoping you didn't mean to but I suspect you did since you've obviously thought about it..."it still seems to me..."
If you want your beliefs and rights to those beliefs to be respected, you might try showing that same respect to others....if it crosses your own religious stance to wish someone good blessings on their faith day of choice and you can't off good wishes without compromise, then don't.
*sigh* I'd like to say sorry, because it seems like I'm often offering pointers or constructive criticism. But I am also aware that I have offered you much positive praise where and when it was appropriate. But I'm not going to apologize for this one. I'm just going to know that as your friend I get to call you on the carpet just as I would expect you to do with me if you thought it appropriate.
no subject
For that matter, I'm ambivalent about Christmas trees, given how/where they originated. And much secular emphasis on gift-giving seems driven by economics and consumerism, not contemplation or faith.
I doubt I'd call you, or someone else, on the carpet if I thought it appropriate. Too direct and blunt and conflicting of a communication style for me to feel comfortable jumping in that way with a friend, or even a sweetie.
no subject
The problem with asserting this position over and over and over again is that it leaves us to take the subtle, indirect and deniable comments that from someone inclined toward more direct communication as being critical or judgemental.
no subject
What I meant to say was more like:
The problem with asserting this position over and over and over again is that it leaves us to take the subtle, indirect and deniable comments from you, that from someone inclined to more direct communication would be neutral, as being critical or judgmental.
no subject
Because Jay is usually indirect about expressing criticism, it is plausible to think that a comment that would be neutral from someone else is a criticism from him.
no subject
no subject
In trying to straddle the middle, you appear to be failing both sides.
no subject
no subject
Also, y'know, sometime I'd rather lose the face and keep the friend. It's ok to be wrong. It's not so ok to never know if your comments mean that you wish I'd do something differently, or that you're actually ok with things.
no subject
Watching old "Yes, Minister" episodes could be useful, if exaggerated somewhat.
no subject
no subject
I think you're conflating "neo-pagan" with "non-JCI", here.
*Lots* of cultures celebrate the Solistice, not just neo-pagans.
no subject
no subject
Having knowledge of JCI practices gives one an impression of having a broad religious knowledge, but on a practical note, it's a lot like knowing three Indo-European languages and feeling that that gives one a broad knowledge of languages in general.
JCI holidays tend to be commemorations of specific points of religious history, but a lot of non-JCI religions have "cycle of the year" celebrations.