Jay's relationship glossary :)
I've had several discussions lately with folks about relationship labels. For myself, I tend to view friendship and relationship as part of a continuous spectrum, with friendships simply being a kind of incomplete/damaged/otherwise-constrained relationship (if close) or else simply a non-hostile person (if not close). These are mine, for my own historical reasons, and I am not trying to persuade anyone else to use them. Only perhaps to better understand what I say, at times?
sweetie: someone with whom I have emotional closeness and affection, a loving relationship. And typically some degree of attachment, and/or ongoing communication with each other. It is regardless of whether there's been any physical play or intimacy in the relationship, of whatever sort. Someone I trust and can have fun with.
lover: is someone with whom I've been some form of physically intimate, ironically whether or not there's any ongoing emotional attachment.
partner = sweetie + lover, plus a deeper ongoing commitment or attachment.
friend: is generally someone with whom I've mutually agreed to not be hostile. Closer to me than an acquaintance, but the term doesn't carry any connotation of openness or safety or support. If someone says "let's just be friends", I hear "we'll agree to not be enemies in the future, but not necessarily anything more." Not a love-relationship, per se.
friend-with-benefits: = friend + lover, without ongoing attachment
ambigu-sweetie: from![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
radven originally, for me this is vaguely friend+sweetie, but since those are along the same continuum, it refers to differing connections in different activities.
tocotox, quantum-relationship: these are placeholder names I use for relationships/friendships that don't easily fit in the above categories, or which may function as one thing in some ways and as a different one in others. Or may probabilistically jump between different energy/connection levels over time, in the latter case.
I last visited this topic about 16 months ago, in this thread.
sweetie: someone with whom I have emotional closeness and affection, a loving relationship. And typically some degree of attachment, and/or ongoing communication with each other. It is regardless of whether there's been any physical play or intimacy in the relationship, of whatever sort. Someone I trust and can have fun with.
lover: is someone with whom I've been some form of physically intimate, ironically whether or not there's any ongoing emotional attachment.
partner = sweetie + lover, plus a deeper ongoing commitment or attachment.
friend: is generally someone with whom I've mutually agreed to not be hostile. Closer to me than an acquaintance, but the term doesn't carry any connotation of openness or safety or support. If someone says "let's just be friends", I hear "we'll agree to not be enemies in the future, but not necessarily anything more." Not a love-relationship, per se.
friend-with-benefits: = friend + lover, without ongoing attachment
ambigu-sweetie: from
radven originally, for me this is vaguely friend+sweetie, but since those are along the same continuum, it refers to differing connections in different activities.tocotox, quantum-relationship: these are placeholder names I use for relationships/friendships that don't easily fit in the above categories, or which may function as one thing in some ways and as a different one in others. Or may probabilistically jump between different energy/connection levels over time, in the latter case.
I last visited this topic about 16 months ago, in this thread.
no subject
And I do love "ambigusweetie," as a word. It is just so perfect, and necessary. :^D
no subject
no subject
no subject
no subject
I think one thing I'm seeing here is the success of your/his term. Now that you've "released it into the wild," it's doing a bit of changing and mutating in different environments.