Jay's relationship glossary :)

[jay]

I've had several discussions lately with folks about relationship labels. For myself, I tend to view friendship and relationship as part of a continuous spectrum, with friendships simply being a kind of incomplete/damaged/otherwise-constrained relationship (if close) or else simply a non-hostile person (if not close). These are mine, for my own historical reasons, and I am not trying to persuade anyone else to use them. Only perhaps to better understand what I say, at times?

sweetie: someone with whom I have emotional closeness and affection, a loving relationship. And typically some degree of attachment, and/or ongoing communication with each other. It is regardless of whether there's been any physical play or intimacy in the relationship, of whatever sort. Someone I trust and can have fun with.

lover: is someone with whom I've been some form of physically intimate, ironically whether or not there's any ongoing emotional attachment.

partner = sweetie + lover, plus a deeper ongoing commitment or attachment.

friend: is generally someone with whom I've mutually agreed to not be hostile. Closer to me than an acquaintance, but the term doesn't carry any connotation of openness or safety or support. If someone says "let's just be friends", I hear "we'll agree to not be enemies in the future, but not necessarily anything more." Not a love-relationship, per se.

friend-with-benefits: = friend + lover, without ongoing attachment

ambigu-sweetie: from radven originally, for me this is vaguely friend+sweetie, but since those are along the same continuum, it refers to differing connections in different activities.

tocotox, quantum-relationship: these are placeholder names I use for relationships/friendships that don't easily fit in the above categories, or which may function as one thing in some ways and as a different one in others. Or may probabilistically jump between different energy/connection levels over time, in the latter case.

I last visited this topic about 16 months ago, in this thread.

Comments

[brian1789.livejournal.com]

Eh. I have some virtues and interesting aspects, and thanks for recognizing them. :) It isn't hard to imagine others valuing me at some level -- just that without a deeper emotional connection, it is harder to see why there would be any level of commitment or affection by the other person.

And this likely reflects my own priorities... regardless of how neat or interesting the other person may be, if there's no chance ever of a capital-R relationship then they immediately get moved to my back-burner?

[satyrlovesong.livejournal.com]

*nods* Yes, I noticed that I've been moved out of the kitchen, so to speak. I'm still quite fond of you though, and wish you well in all things. I'll look after you as I do all the folks I'm fond of. YOUR job is just to put up with my pedantic self, sort of like taking one's cod liver oil. *cheeky grin*

[brian1789.livejournal.com]

Oh, I'm happy enough to put up with, even appreciate your pedantic self. (wink) Even if internally I tend to think of us as "failed relationship" rather than "friends", per se, since you've seen past more of my defenses than a friend typically would.