Rocky

Dec. 14th, 2002 09:14 pm
jay: (flowers)
[personal profile] jay
It's been stormy here all day, with sheets of water and high winds at times. [profile] patgreene has been ill and in bed for most of the day, so I've been watching the kids and shopping online. Including for a new DSL provider -- telocity is going away in <90 days, according to today's newspaper. So we'll need yet another email transition in a month or so. Sigh. After reading online reviews, I signed up with DSLExtreme (despite the name *). But I'm tired of having to resubscribe to mailing lists and notifying friends -- I only just got around to updating the SFSI lists 2 weeks ago, so I could unsubscribe from AOL.

I need something more stable, more solid and predictable, address-wise. Carved in stone, as it were... so I'm registering my own domain name, lithic.net. I'll probably rename our machines (paleo, neo) and router (endo)... not a bad choice for a part-time geophysicist. Besides, "vitreous" was already taken...

Given Pat's condition, it is just as well that we had earlier bowed out of going to a party tonight, for complex reasons. I had had thoughts of going contra dancing, but am taking care of the kids instead. And there are rare flashes of lightning outside. Cool. I attempted to go shopping this afternoon, made no headway but had an entertaining 2-hour coffee with [personal profile] brooksmoses instead :-).

Date: 2002-12-15 01:00 am (UTC)
brooksmoses: (Default)
From: [personal profile] brooksmoses
(I always worry about easily-guessed themed machine names, for security reasons - am I just being paranoid?)

In this day and age of frequent port-scans down all the numbers in an IP-address block, I'd suspect you're either being too paranoid, or not paranoid enough. Security through obscurity is obsolete; the machines need sufficient security to handle being found, whether or not they're given guessable names, and so the guessable names are pretty irrelevant.

Meanwhile, would I come across as cynical if I pointed out that paleo.lithic.net is unlikely to be "easily guessable" for a cracker-script (or its likely user)?

- Brooks

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 12:53 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios