Intensity

Feb. 22nd, 2002 12:13 pm
jay: (defiant)
[personal profile] jay
I should be working on my launch vehicle automation recommendations... or even catching up on e-mail or LJ entries. But I'm just too annoyed and cranky right now. So those things will have to wait.


A close friend (who shall remain nameless, and who is not on LiveJournal) has a side business with a large trade show coming up this weekend. Before a show, this person (K) tends to get edgy and tense, and can come across as harsh or unfeeling. I sent an e-mail recently to the effect of "(pout), sorry I won't get to see you for a couple of weeks, but good luck" and got blistered in return. I am being called on it because my expressing regret at zir's busyness or absence makes zir feel guilty or uncomfortable. Zir is asking me to do a better job of hiding my feelings in the future, at least any that might make zir uncomfortable "being totally emotionally honest at all times is NOT always the best policy." And I wasn't even trying to put a guilt trip on zir, but to express mild regret -- actually, is it more positive or negative to tell someone, "good luck, and I'll miss you"? Better to simply not acknowledge, as though one wouldn't notice zir's absence at all? I need to figure out what K really wants.

As things are, I routinely try to tailor my emotional response around K to match K's daily cues -- distant if K seems distant, closer and more affectionate if K acts closer. Trying to stay within K's level of comfort for the friendship, whatever that is today. Not what I actually feel at any given encounter, but projecting whatever emotional facade that K seems to want from me. Not that this is unique, I tend to do this to some extent in all of my friendships and relationships. Otherwise I doubt that most friends would stay around.

Possibly because unfettered, I come off as too intense and focussed. At least that's what K says. Zie says that I drive people off by being too intense, pushing to be too close too quickly, which sets off others' defense reactions. Which actually correlates with my setting up filters and only letting out as much intensity as I think that friendship or relationship can handle at a given time. Sometimes I over-or under-shoot, and things get awkward.

Date: 2002-02-22 12:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] sinboy.livejournal.com
Someone in that crappy a mood, IME, dosn't really want something, so no matter what you say, or don't say, you'll say it wrong.

Date: 2002-02-22 12:36 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mittelbar.livejournal.com
I think that someone who reacts to what you say you said by telling you you need to turn down your emotions may be a lovely person but is not who you want to listen to when calibrationg your normal behavior. That is what I think.

2 cents and more

Date: 2002-02-22 05:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greeklady.livejournal.com
I think anyone who will not accept your affections with open arms is a fool. I have a few choice words for that person too.

Saying that, I know there are certain times where I will be in a mood where nothing can be said correctly to me. This may be that time for this person. Let them be and let it roll off your back.

That being said, I think I know the situation. Don't let it stress you out.

Date: 2002-02-22 08:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] elynne.livejournal.com
I don't make/retain friendships easily with people who I feel I need to constantly be on alert around. If I can't be comfortable with somebody, then I usually don't want them around me that much. At least, in order to maintain a friendship, I need to find some level of equilibrium. But That's Just Me.

Do you often feel that you need to be on eggshells with your other friends of similar closeness? Or does K seem to be more explodey than other people? I strongly suspect, as has been mentioned, that calibrating your emotional/interpersonal settings by a person who is touchier than most is not the best idea.

Uh... have to go; [livejournal.com profile] violetvixen is being eaten by a dress pattern. :P

Date: 2002-02-24 12:20 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
Agreed. So what I wound up doing yesterday was a note to the effect of "let's not discuss this until after your show," which didn't draw further fire.

Of course, I've now heard that the show isn't going well, so maybe afterwards will be no better...

Date: 2002-02-24 12:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
Thanks. Actually, that person isn't calibrating my normal behavior, per se... just my behavior when zie is present. (smile)

Re: 2 cents and more

Date: 2002-02-24 12:26 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
I've decided to put it behind me and relax. And you're being sweet, or else fools are relatively commonplace ;-)

Date: 2002-02-24 12:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
I could find equilibrium with K, if zie would zirself stabilize. It's the varying interest and energy on K's part that keeps it feeling unnatural and guarded. Levels of interest and affection that are OK one day, coming from me to K, later aren't OK. And then are OK again still later.

K is certainly more "explodey" than my other friends... my interpersonal settings tend to vary by friend or relationship, depending on the level of closeness and stability. If either of those is positive, then I can relax filters somewhat and let more of myself out, without worrying about its effect. When neither is positive, then I'm usually walking on eggshells and carefully projecting what I think that my friend or sweetie wants to see and hear coming from me.

Hope that violetvixem escaped unscathed...

According to...

Date: 2002-02-24 08:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] greeklady.livejournal.com
A book I read they had this statement:

People are stupid.

nuff said?
Page generated Jan. 22nd, 2026 06:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios