Well, it was a slightly different context (an in-joke, as it were) that I was teasing about, but I definitely think there should be a line of thank you cards for partners' partners. =)
I don't think warm-up was required in that particular case. Remember, my request was for you to extinguish the situation, not to ignite it, so to speak.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
no subject
Date: 2004-09-02 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-02 08:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-09-02 01:39 pm (UTC)yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 04:05 pm (UTC)Not the same one, mind you, but I've got my own related take on things.
(I did, incidentally, get a lovely little email from points Further North this morning, to add to the lets-all-comperse-together scenario)
Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 06:00 pm (UTC)No? Well, damn. ;)
Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 06:18 pm (UTC)But if it helps, I'd be sending the card to you. (which might help clarify the content).
Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 06:46 pm (UTC)Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 06:54 pm (UTC)Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 07:01 pm (UTC)Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 07:09 pm (UTC)now this is taking on an altogether different significance, and perhaps you'll have the same person sending *that same* hallmark card to you?
(blush)
Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 11:39 pm (UTC)Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 11:47 pm (UTC)well *she* started it! (sticking out tongue)
(planting tongue firmly back in cheek)
Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-02 11:38 pm (UTC)Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-03 05:05 am (UTC)Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-03 09:42 pm (UTC)(mind the [sock] gap)
Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-04 03:47 am (UTC)Re: yeah, well...
Date: 2004-09-04 06:28 am (UTC)