rotational greetings...
Dec. 20th, 2005 07:25 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Happy solstice, for those who celebrate it.... it doesn't work for me, per se, but I respect the choices of others to follow their own spiritual paths.
...
A useful link for those inclined to planetary movement-based holidays (solstice, equinoxes, etc) is here, with tables of dates and UTC times of each from 1992-2020.
...
A useful link for those inclined to planetary movement-based holidays (solstice, equinoxes, etc) is here, with tables of dates and UTC times of each from 1992-2020.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-21 03:39 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-21 03:43 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-21 03:55 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-21 05:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-21 06:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-21 07:25 am (UTC)I would like to leave this thread with the following parting thoughts.
Please take this rhetorically if you like.
Do you find it necessary or appropriate to pass the same disclaimers as you have here when passing on seasonal well wishes to persons of Jewish faith?
Have you observed this level of disclaimer as common or useful in social settings between people of differing religious backgrounds?
As someone with a stated preference for avoiding making direct confrontational statements, can you imagine the connotation that going to the lengths you have here to disclaim yourself from this particular belief set above and beyond cultural norms?
I think that last one is source of the disconnect between your intention on this post and the reaction from your reader-friends here.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 05:12 pm (UTC)More relevant, actually, are disclaimers I issue WRT Southern Baptists and other Christian fundamentalists -- not because of confusion over what they're doing, per se, but because I feel like I need to differentiate my practices and beliefs and politics from theirs, and in some circles I'm assumed to agree unless I overtly dissent. I don't want to be mistaken as passing as a evangelical fundie, even though I *could* in many situations (particularly around my parents' in Atlanta, where it is as much the assumed cultural norm as paganism is an assumed norm in many poly circles) by doing or saying nothing.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-21 07:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 05:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-22 07:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 12:29 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 12:31 am (UTC)If I were going to be direct here, I might kindly recommend that you go perform some uncomfortable obscene act on yourself, given that you're trying to put words and motives in my mouth...
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 07:02 am (UTC)In any case - yeah, I am trying to ascribe motives to your actions. I'm trying things on to see if they fit, because the obvious-to-me interpretations just aren't flattering and I really want to think better of you than that. In fact I generally do think better of you than the reactions I've been having to this thread. So I'm trying to figure out the disconnect.
Unfortunately, this is pretty clearly well passed the point of rational discussion. Sorry that I managed to push your buttons quite so far. I admit to intentionally pushing, it's how I interact with the world, but I didn't intend to get you quite so lathered up, and for that much, I apologize.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-24 06:00 am (UTC)I haven't seen these interactions as you constructively addressing my own goals or needs, only trying to score points and embarrass me online (poking?)... and I find myself repeatedly during/after in a position where I'm angry and confrontational and defensive. Sometimes persisting for a week or two after the dust settles. This is in marked contrast to our in-person interactions, which have been much more pleasant and friendly.
I try to stoically absorb and not respond to some level of button-pushing, in the name of not making a fuss and local harmony, but at some point I hit my own red zones.
While I still wouldn't buy make yourself feel better, (see Les's view, she was on-target), I appreciate the apology, and thanks.
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 12:49 am (UTC)Is that at all close to what you're intending?
no subject
Date: 2005-12-23 01:02 am (UTC)