jay: (flowers)
jay ([personal profile] jay) wrote2002-12-14 09:14 pm

Rocky

It's been stormy here all day, with sheets of water and high winds at times. [profile] patgreene has been ill and in bed for most of the day, so I've been watching the kids and shopping online. Including for a new DSL provider -- telocity is going away in <90 days, according to today's newspaper. So we'll need yet another email transition in a month or so. Sigh. After reading online reviews, I signed up with DSLExtreme (despite the name *). But I'm tired of having to resubscribe to mailing lists and notifying friends -- I only just got around to updating the SFSI lists 2 weeks ago, so I could unsubscribe from AOL.

I need something more stable, more solid and predictable, address-wise. Carved in stone, as it were... so I'm registering my own domain name, lithic.net. I'll probably rename our machines (paleo, neo) and router (endo)... not a bad choice for a part-time geophysicist. Besides, "vitreous" was already taken...

Given Pat's condition, it is just as well that we had earlier bowed out of going to a party tonight, for complex reasons. I had had thoughts of going contra dancing, but am taking care of the kids instead. And there are rare flashes of lightning outside. Cool. I attempted to go shopping this afternoon, made no headway but had an entertaining 2-hour coffee with [personal profile] brooksmoses instead :-).

[identity profile] nolly.livejournal.com 2002-12-14 09:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Telocity still exists somewhere, or is DirecTV DSL dying? (I signed up with Telocity, but it turned into DirecTV some time ago. If DirecTV's dying, I may consider Ricochet.)

[identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com 2002-12-14 10:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Telocity was swallowed by DirectTV DSL, but existing subscribers at that time got to keep their telocity.com address. Hughes (which owns both) announced Friday that they were laying-off everyone in the DirectTV DSL/Telocity unit and ending service within 90 days. They will probably handoff subscribers to the local telephone company as a default (e.g., to SBC out here).

[identity profile] nolly.livejournal.com 2002-12-14 10:55 pm (UTC)(link)
Joyous. I suspect you have more local alternatives than I do.
geekchick: (geekchick)

[personal profile] geekchick 2002-12-15 12:10 am (UTC)(link)
We've actually been relatively pleased with Speakeasy (it's not their fault that we can't get *real* DSL to our apartment).

[identity profile] purpletigron.livejournal.com 2002-12-15 12:39 am (UTC)(link)
Given Pat's condition

:-((( Hoping for rapid improvements...

lithic.net

Sounds cool!

(I always worry about easily-guessed themed machine names, for security reasons - am I just being paranoid?)
brooksmoses: (Default)

[personal profile] brooksmoses 2002-12-15 01:00 am (UTC)(link)
(I always worry about easily-guessed themed machine names, for security reasons - am I just being paranoid?)

In this day and age of frequent port-scans down all the numbers in an IP-address block, I'd suspect you're either being too paranoid, or not paranoid enough. Security through obscurity is obsolete; the machines need sufficient security to handle being found, whether or not they're given guessable names, and so the guessable names are pretty irrelevant.

Meanwhile, would I come across as cynical if I pointed out that paleo.lithic.net is unlikely to be "easily guessable" for a cracker-script (or its likely user)?

- Brooks
brooksmoses: (Default)

[personal profile] brooksmoses 2002-12-15 01:07 am (UTC)(link)
It was, indeed, quite an entertaining coffee (or, in my case, hot cocoa) -- thank you for mentioning that you were not too busy this weekend, and for spending some of it with me!

I do hope Pat is better soon.

Oh, and the power was indeed back on when I got back to our house. It apparently was out for somewhere around two to three hours, though.

- Brooks