jay: (posing)
[personal profile] jay
I scored
65 ¾%
on the classic 400 Point Purity Test!
Take the test here!


Given that most of my friends are in the 30s-50s, I suppose that this is yet another measure of how I'm unsuited for their company, out of their collective league, &c...

unrequested advice

Date: 2003-04-12 03:02 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mactavish.livejournal.com
Given that most of my friends are in the 30s-50s, I suppose that this is yet another measure of how I'm unsuited for their company, out of their collective league, &c...

First: The purity test really isn't valid.

Second: Of my friends who've taken tests, the scores range from in the 30s to in the 70s. The results mean nothing in terms of who's in who's league. They're just for fun. It's like me saying, "Wow, [livejournal.com profile] sinboy has lived in Singapore! I must be out of his league," or [livejournal.com profile] brian1789 is a scientist! I'm out of his league!" They are not about compatibility. They're a lot about a silly game.

Third: Affirmations can be negative, too. If you're affirming that you're socially unacceptable, it will continue to sink into your gut even deeper, and social situations just might become more awkward for you. It might be time to get back to your Lenten practice. Try to find good things in situations (you *were* social last night! quietly so, but you were) and write about them, too. Give them the weight they deserve!

Re: unrequested advice

Date: 2003-04-12 05:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
The test is really not terribly accurate or scientific, it's a game... but it does loosely reflect past life experiences in the romance/sexual area. Great disparaties reflect a lack of shared experience, and perhaps lack of understanding between people or groups. Things I might find scary or exciting or novel might be merely a jaded BTDT to someone with a score in the 30s... who might not understand my reactions, in turn. And in my own relationships, what can I offer someone with lots of other experiences? It's intimidating to contemplate.

There were positive aspects of last night -- it wasn't a disaster, just not much fun. I was glad to see you and [personal profile] joedecker there. And I've continued the Lenten discipline, although I'm now behind.

Social unacceptability isn't inherent for me, it may just be that I'm unacceptable in the poly community. Too geeky, too much of an ingenue, too suburban-with-kids, too inexperienced, too clueless.

And [personal profile] sinboy is out of my league, anyway... ;-).

An unrequested observation

Date: 2003-04-13 12:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ag-unicorn.livejournal.com
The test is really not terribly accurate or scientific, it's a game... but it does loosely reflect past life experiences in the romance/sexual area. Great disparaties reflect a lack of shared experience, and perhaps lack of understanding between people or groups.

An observation on this, if I might:

The purity test not only reflects past life experiences...it reflects personal interest in some of the things that are asked about (specifically the substance use bits, and some of the sexual bits reflect interest as well as experience).

In many purity tests, I score abnormally high because there is a heavy weighting on some areas that I simply will always be pure in, largely because I have no interest in ever losing some of those purity points (I'm not into necrophilia, for example, and never will be).

My score on this one? 33.3%...but there's a lot less weighting on the drugs and such, and a lot more weighting on the sorts of things I did when I was a sexually-frustrated teenager.

I think a high score is not necessarily a reflection on either your past experiences or your desireability (other than to those for whom depurifying a person is an end into and of itself. ;) ).

And, above all...it's for fun, and remarkably subjective. :)

Re: An unrequested observation

Date: 2003-04-13 12:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
it reflects personal interest in some of the things that are asked about

granted... and while there are many things listed in which I have no interest (hard drugs, scat, necrophilia, etc.) there's certainly interest on my part in the sexual areas. I simply never sowed any wild oats, proverbially, either as a teenager or later... nose-to-the-grindstone, 80-hour week-after-week in grad school, being "responsible" and "mature" as a teen or 20-something.

When I was a sexually-frustrated teenager, I did my best to follow the advice I was given and deny and control those impulses, aided by being generally-unattractive and a social outcast. So I feel like an invisible wall separates me from those friends who have (or had) a wilder side. Sort of a different angle on squandering one's youth, I guess...

Re: unrequested advice

Date: 2003-04-13 08:22 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
I think...I think maybe it might be good for you to read Noel's OLQ pages about "suburban-with-kids" poly.

Re: unrequested advice

Date: 2003-04-13 08:40 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] brian1789.livejournal.com
Okay... but who's Noel, and where are his/her OLQ (online quote?) pages? Thanks...

Re: unrequested advice

Date: 2003-04-13 08:44 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
http://www.ourlittlequad.com/

Actually, Noel's got a livejournal. I just can't remember what username it's under.

Re: unrequested advice

Date: 2003-04-13 09:37 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] ag-unicorn.livejournal.com
Actually, Noel's got a livejournal. I just can't remember what username it's under.

[livejournal.com profile] noelfigart

Re: unrequested advice

Date: 2003-04-25 10:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mama-hogswatch.livejournal.com
While I heartily agree that everyone should certainly read the OLQ site as it is the acme of web brilliance, I was having a hard time following exactly WHY this particular person would find it useful to do so?

Re: unrequested advice

Date: 2003-04-25 10:08 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] trinker.livejournal.com
I don't remember specifically, but I associate a tone the OLQ site with a reminder that a polyamorous relationship still is about the prosaic stuff, too.

May 2009

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 21st, 2026 03:57 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios